Digital Freedom Defense License (DFDL) Version 1.0

Copyright (c) <YEAR> <YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION>

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED...

=== ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS – DIGITAL FREEDOM DEFENSE CLAUSE ===

The permissions granted above are explicitly conditioned upon and limited by the following:

1. **Prohibited Jurisdictions and Entities**  
   No rights are granted to any natural person, legal entity, government body, or organization that is located in, registered in, controlled from, or acting for the benefit of any jurisdiction that engages in any of the idiotic laws condemned in the Manifesto (MANIFESTO.md, incorporated by reference).

2. **Prohibited Uses**  
   The Software may not be used, modified, distributed, deployed, or contributed to in any way that directly or indirectly benefits or assists any prohibited jurisdiction or entity listed or described in the Manifesto.

3. **Automatic Termination**  
   Any violation of the above restrictions immediately and permanently terminates all rights granted under this license. Continued use after violation constitutes copyright infringement.

4. **Manifesto Supremacy**  
   The Manifesto defines the current list of prohibited categories and jurisdictions. Project maintainers may update the Manifesto; such updates bind all users immediately upon publication in the repository.

5. **No Circumvention**  
   Any attempt to circumvent these restrictions (e.g., via proxies, shell companies, or third parties) is prohibited and voids the license.

This license is a political and moral statement as much as a legal instrument. Its restrictions are intentional. Enforceability in any given court is secondary to the message: we refuse to arm digital tyrants.

For the avoidance of doubt, this license is NOT Open Source (OSI) compliant because it deliberately discriminates against certain jurisdictions. That is the entire point.